Abstract
Criminal law reform is part of criminal law policy and is closely related to law enforcement policies, criminal policies and social policies. One of the forms of national legal development reform is the Reform of the Criminal Justice System (SPP) which is an integral part of a sub-system, namely legal substance, legal structure, and legal culture. Corruption as an organized crime in Indonesia is categorized as extra ordinary crimes that have an impact on the creation of injustice in society. One of the injustices referred to is related to the non-return of state losses stolen by corruptors. Whereas efforts to recover state losses are closely related to legal instruments in force in a country. In Indonesia, the Criminal Code and the Law on the Eradication of Corruption places the confiscation of proceeds of corruption only as an additional punishment and does not have a clear formula for the mechanism of deprivation of properties, resulting in unclarity/obscurity of norms. This condition should not occur, therefore it is necessary to reform the criminal law immediately by studying the criminal perpetrators of a criminological perspective, which is related to the factors that cause people to commit criminal acts of curruption.   This article is a study of the author concerning the importance of making legal arrangements regarding the deprivation of properties from the proceeds of corruption to mitigate the state losses. This article is compiled by applying normative legal research using statutory approaches, historical approaches, conceptual approaches and comparative approaches. It is concluded that there must be immediate reform of criminal law in Indonesia, especially regarding the deprivation of properties from the criminal act of corruption based on the development of criminal behavior (criminology) and the development of international criminal law concerning corruption.
References
Atmasasmita, R. (2010). Teori dan Kapita Selekta Kriminologi. Bandung: PT Refika ditama. p. 23-49. Available at: http://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20132436
Arief, B.N. (2009). Pembaharuan Sistem Penegakan Hukum Dengan Pendekatan Religius Dalam Konteks Siskumnas Dan Bangkumnas. Paper in Seminar “Menembus Kebuntuan Legalitas Formal Menuju Pembangunan Hukum dengan Pendekatan Hukum Progresifâ€, 19 December 2009. The above title is a modification of title set by the committee (Reform in Law Enforcement System with religious moral values). Semarang: Faculty of Law of Diponogoro University.
Ediwarman, A.S., Hamdan, M., Yunara, E. (2017). Analisis Hukum DalamPemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Psikologi Kriminal (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Medan). Vol 5. No.1. Medan: USU Law Journal. Available at: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/164941-ID-analisis-hukum-dalam-pemberantasan-tinda.pdf
Edywarman. (2012) Paradoks Penegakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Kriminologi di Indonesia, Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia Vol. 8 No.1. May. Medan: Faculty of Law, University of North Sumatra. Available at: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/4169-ID-paradoks-penegakan-hukum-pidana-dalam-perspektif-kriminologi-di-indonesia.pdf
Fatoni, S. (2016). Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan, Perspektif teoritis dan pragmatis untuk keadilan. Malang: Setara Press. p.17.
Haley, J. (2011). Beyond Retribution: An Integrated Approach to Restorative Justice. Washington: Washitong University Journal of Law and Policy, Volume 36 Restorative Justice. Pages 3. Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.co.id/&httpsredir=1&article=1040&context=law_journal_law_policy
Marzuki, P.M. (2008). Penelitian Hukum, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, p. 35. Available at: http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/buku/detail/penelitian-hukum-peter-mahmud-marzuki-31465.html
Rawls, J. (2011). Teori Keadilan, Dasar-dasar filsafat politik untuk mewujudkan kesejahteraan sosial dalam Negara. Translation of the original title A Theory of justice, Yogyakarta: Publisher Pustaka Pelajar, p.13-16.
Soedjono, D. (1979), Konsepsi Kriminologi dalam usaha penanggulangan kejahatan (Crime Prevention), Bandung: Alumni. p. 5.
Suharti, T. (2000). Kajian Kriminologi Terhadap Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Perspektif Volume V no 22, Edition April 2000. p. 131. Available at: http://jurnal-perspektif.org/index.php/perspektif/index
Swardhana, G.M. (2020). Materi kuliah Perkembangan hukum pidana dan kriminologi of Doctoral Program (S3). Law Science of Udayana University in Denpasar.
Tama, S. L., Bahrain, Wasef, M., Wahyu ,T., Asram. (2014). Studi atas Disparitas Putusan Pemidanaan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Indonesia Corruption Watch, p.3. Available at: https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/45370/studi-atas-disparitas-putusan-pemidanaan-perkara-tindak-pidana-korupsi
Yusuf, M. (2013). Merampas Aset Koruptor; Solusi Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Kompas Media Nusantara. p. 162.
Yuwanto, L. (2015). Profil Koruptor Berdasarkan Tinjauan Basic Human Values. Jurnal Integritas. Volume. 1 No.1, Jakarta: KPK. p. 5. Available at: https://jurnal.kpk.go.id/index.php/integritas/article/view/111
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Yogi Yasa WEDHA, Edy NURCAHYO