EVALUATING THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN OF 3RD GENERATION SPACES THROUGH A STUDIO STUDY
PDF

Keywords

Landscape Design, Concept, Form, 3rd Generation Cafe Landscape.

How to Cite

AYAN ÇEVEN, E. (2022). EVALUATING THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN OF 3RD GENERATION SPACES THROUGH A STUDIO STUDY. PRIZREN SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 6(3), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.32936/pssj.v6i3.368

Abstract

The transformation of the concept-form relationship into a concrete expression in the design experience, which is considered a challenging process, is one of the essential parts of this process. In this process, in which various methods are evaluated, the form seen as a communication tool occurs through distinct connotations. Within the scope of this study, students' search for form in a landscape design project problem, their connotations in the education process, and thus their solutions to the design problem were evaluated.

In the study, the studies of the students made during a semester were criticized in the presence of the coordinator. The concept of coffee and its associations in the landscape design of the 3rd Generation coffee sales unit in a campus venue, the sources they inspired and their final projects constitute the material of this study. The concept-form relationships of the projects were examined and, as a result, it was determined that it was easier for students to transfer certain formal objects to the projects in the search for form.

https://doi.org/10.32936/pssj.v6i3.368
PDF

References

Ackoff, R. L. (2010). Systems Thinking for Curious Managers. Triarchy Press. Available at: https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=rLZJEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=1.%09Ackoff,+R.+L.+(2010).+Systems+Thinking+for+Curious+Managers.+Triarchy+Press.&ots=Hsjo9djLxk&sig=yr4fQ8jjKfttnor55qqPKDLbzCE&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=1.%09Ackoff%2C%20R.%20L.%20(2010).%20Systems%20Thinking%20for%20Curious%20Managers.%20Triarchy%20Press.&f=false

Alpak, E. M., Özkan, D. G., & Düzenli, T. (2018). Systems Approach İn Landscape Design: A Studio Work. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), 593-611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9402-7

Leblebici-Başar, D., & Altarriba, J. (2013). The Role of İmagery and Emotion İn The Translation of Concepts İnto Product Form. The Design Journal, 16(3), 295-314. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630613X13660502571787

Bayramoğlu, E., Büyükkurt, U., & Yurdakul, N. M. (2019). Peyzaj Mimarlığı Eğitiminde Proje Tasarım Süreci: Trabzon “Karagöz Meydanı” Çevre Tasarım Projeleri. Social Sciences, 14(1), 15-24. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/nwsasocial/issue/42905/427106

Bonnardel, N. (2000). Towards Understanding and Supporting Creativity İn Design: Analogies In A Constrained Cognitive Environment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 13(7-8), 505-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-7051(00)00067-8

Casakin, H., & Goldschmidt, G. (1999). Expertise and The Use of Visual Analogy: İmplications for Design Education. Design Studies, 20(2), 153-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00032-5

Creswell, J. P., & Clark, V. L. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Vol. 3d. https://sci-hub.hkvisa.net/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x

Dorst, K. (2006). Design Problems and Design Paradoxes. Design Issues, 22(3), 4-17. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25224059

Düzenli, T., & Alpak, E. M. (2020). Peyzaj Mimarlığı Çevre Tasarım. Sanat Eğitimi Dergisi, 1, 31–42. Available at: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=921781

Erarslan, A. (2016). Mimaride Anlam; Yapıdaki “Sembolik Dil” Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Tasarım+ Kuram, 10(18), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.23835/tasarimkuram.239593

Erdem Aksoy. (1975). Mimarlıkta Tasarım İletim Ve Denetim. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi.

Gazvoda, D. (2002). Characteristics of Modern Landscape Architecture and İts Education. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(2), 117-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00064-6

Goldschmidt, G. (1997). Capturing In Determinism: Representation In The Design Problem Space. Design Studies, 18(4), 441-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00011-2

Howard, T. J./Culley, Stephen. J./Dekoninck, Elies:(2008). Describing The Creative Design Process By The Integration Of Engineering Design And Cognitive Psychology Literature. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001

Mumcu, S., Düzenli, T., & Alpak, E. M. (2021). Peyzaj MimarlığI Tasarım StüDyosu Deneyimlerinin Yeni Tasarım Problemlerinde Kullanılması: Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Örneği. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi. 11(2), 260-279. https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1048385

Roozenburg, N. F., & Eekels, J. (1995). Product Design: Fundamentals Methods. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043799608910069

Özkan, D. G., Alpak, E. M., & Düzenli, T. (2016). Tasarım Eğitiminde Yaratıcılığın Geliştirilmesi: Peyzaj Mimarlığı Çevre Tasarımı Stüdyo Çalışması. Ijasos-International E-Journal of Advances İn Social Sciences, 2(4), 136-143. Available at: http://ijasos.ocerintjournals.org/en/download/article-file/232093

Bingöl, M. P. (2016). Temel Tasarim Eğitiminde Kavramdan Üç Boyuta Geçişe Yönelik Bir Uygulama Örneği. İdil Sanat Ve Dil Dergisi, 5(21), 339-362. Available at: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=694137

San, İ. (2003). Sanat Eğitimi Kuramları, Utopya Yayınevi.

Şentürer, A. (2004). Mimarlıkta Estetikte Tasarımda Eğitimde Eleştirel Yaklaşım. Yapı-Endüstri Merkezi. İStanbul : Yapı-EndüStri Merkezi.

Simon, H. A. (1988). The Science of Design: Creating The Artificial. Design Issues, 67-82. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511391

Visser, W. (1994). Organisation of Design Activities: Opportunistic, With Hierarchical Episodes. Interacting with Computers, 6(3), 239-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0953-5438(94)90015-9

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Elif AYAN ÇEVEN

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.