This study highlights the overall current performance of Agamengi forest management. Descriptive survey method was employed in this study. A total of 182 respondents from 2183 households were selected through simple random sampling technique.Questionnaire, key informant interview and focus group discussions were mainly employed as data collection tools in this study. This desirable sample size was determined by using Yamane‘s statistical sample size determination formula. The major findings of this study revealed that the status and management of Agamengi forest in the last 30 years was much dense and there was proper management of the forest. However, the current forest status is degraded and the forest management is poor mainly due to rapid population pressure, high demand for fuel-wood, farmland expansion, charcoal making and inadequate implementation of forest laws. This study recommends that all concerned stakeholders should work together to keep and maintain the quality of the Agemengi forest through applying re-afforestation and afforestation methods.
Key words: Causes, Degradation, Fuel Wood, Resource, Status.
2. Aklilu A., Feyera S. & Tsegaye B. (2004). Impact of Participatory Forest Management Practice in Adaba-Dodola Forest Priority Area of Oromia, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Natural Resource, 6: 89–109.
3. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) (2009). State of the World’s Forests. Rome: FAO.
4. Girma A. (2005). Rehabilitation and sustainable use of degraded community forests in the Bale Mountains of Ethiopia. Inaugural Dissertation. Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
5. Mulugeta L. & Melaku B. (2008). Participatory Forest Management Best Practices, Lessons Learnt and Challenges Encountered: The Ethiopian and Tanzanian Experience Farm–Africa/SOS-Sahel, March 2008. Africa/SOS-Sahel.
6. Nilsson, S. (2005). Experiences of policy reforms of the forest sector in transition and other countries. Forest Policy and Economics 7, 831–847.