Fatalism – Georgian Cultural Model


Fatalism, Cultural Model, Emic Approach, Mutually Inclusive

How to Cite

CHKHAIDZE, T., CHUBINIDZE, D., & GEGENAVA, E. (2019). Fatalism – Georgian Cultural Model. PRIZREN SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 3(3), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.32936/pssj.v3i3.125


Fatalism—belief that all events are predetermined and therefore inevitable—have been studied by researchers from different disciplines as it is a significant notion to explain various aspects of individual and social life (health behavior, economic capital, political activity, social participation, etc.).  However, the weakness of using only etic methods to understand this complex phenomenon is strongly emphasized. We fully share this viewpoint and think that it is far more appropriate to study fatalism with an interdisciplinary approach such as Contemporary Psychological Anthropology. The aim of the present study was to emphasize the theoretical and methodological opportunities of studying fatalism within this field (specifically, within cultural models school) and presenting the results of the empirical study on the Georgian cultural model of fatalism in the light of the opportunities discussed.

 The theoretical apparatus of the cultural models' school allowed us to think of culturally shaped fatalism, not only as an element of objective culture beyond the mind but also as a part of the mind, namely, as a cognitive schema formed on the basis of shared experiences. To reveal components of this schema we used the in-depth interview as a data collection method and cultural analysis of discourse (specifically, metaphor analysis) as the data analysis method. Personal control, Deity, Destiny, Luck, and Helplessness emerged as the components of Georgian cultural schema according to this analysis.

Key words: Fatalism, Cultural Model, Emic Approach, Mutually Inclusive.



1. Acevado, G. (2008). Islamic fatalism and the clash of civilizations: An appraisal of a contentious and dubious theory. Social Forces, 86(4), pp. 1711-1752. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0033
2. Acevedo, G. (2005). Turning anomie on its head: fatalism as Durkheim's concealed and multidimensional alienation theory. Sociological Theory, 23(1), pp. 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00243.x
3. Barrett, J., & Keil, F. (1996). Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology, 31, pp. 219–247. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0017
4. Bernard, T., Dercon, S., & Taffesse, A. (2011). Beyond fatalism-an empirical exploration of self-efficacy and aspirations failure in Ethiopia.
5. Chen, N., & Young, M. (2018). The Relationship Between Belief in Stable Luck and a Propensity for Superstition: The Influence of Culturally Conferred Agency Beliefs. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(7), pp. 1098-1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118777296
6. D’Orlando, F., Ferrante, F., & Ruiu, G. (2011). Culturally based beliefs and labor market institutions. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(2), pp. 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2010.12.010
7. D'Andrade, R. (1992). Schemas and motivation. In R. D'Andrade, & C. Strauss, Human motives and cultural models (pp. 23–44). Cambridge University Press.
8. D'andrade, R. G., & Strauss, C. (1992). Human motives and cultural models. Cambridge University Press.
9. Dressler, W. (2017). Culture and the individual: Theory and method of cultural consonance. Routledge.
10. Dressler, W. W., & Oths, K. S. (2014). Social survey methods. In H. R. Bernard & C. C. Gravlee (Eds.), Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology (2nd ed., pp. 497–515). Lanham, MD:AltaMira Press.
12. Esparza, O., Wiebe, J., & Quiñones, J. (2015). Simultaneous development of a multidimensional fatalism measure in English and Spanish. Current Psychology 34(4), pp. 597-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9272-z
13. Fatalism. (2019). In Lexico dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/fatalism
14. Fortes, M. (2018). Oedipus and Job in West African religion: The 1956 Frazer Lecture. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 8(1-2), pp. 394-413. https://doi.org/10.1086/698432
15. Goodwin, R., & Allen, P. (2000). Democracy and Fatalism in the Former Soviet Union 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(12), pp. 2558-2574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02450.x
16. Goodwin, R., Allen, P., Nizharadze, G., Emelyanova, T., Dedkova, N., Saenko, Y., & Bugrova, I. (2002). Fatalism, social support, and mental health in four former Soviet cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), pp. 1166-1171. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672022812002
17. Guimarães, D. (2019). Towards a cultural revision of psychological concepts. Culture & Psychology 25(2), pp. 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X18820632
18. Holland, D., & Quinn, N. (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge University Press.
19. Huang, Y., Bedford, O., & Zhang, Y. (2018). The relational orientation framework for examining culture in Chinese societies. Culture & Psychology, 24(4), pp. 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X17729362
20. Kapp, K. (1963). Hindu culture, economic development and social planning in India. Asia Publishing House.
21. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press. Chicago, IL.
22. Lu, L. (2012). Etic or emic? Measuring culture in international business research. International Business Research, 5(5), p. 109. https://doi:10.5539/ibr.v5n5p109
23. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2003). Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action. In V. Murphy-Berman & J. J. Berman (Eds.), Vol. 49 of the Nebraska symposium on motivation. Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self (p. 18–74). University of Nebraska Press.
24. Menon, T., Morris, M., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1999). Culture and the construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76(5), pp. 701-717. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.701
25. Morris, M., Menon, T., & Ames, D. (2001). Culturally conferred conceptions of agency: A key to social perception of persons, groups, and other actors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), pp. 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0502_7
26. Moscovici, S. (2001). Social representations: Essays in social psychology. NYU Press.
27. Norenzayan, A., & Lee, A. (2010). It was meant to happen: explaining cultural variations in fate attributions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 98(5), p. 702. DOI: 10.1037/a0019141
28. Omi, Y. (2012). Collectivistic individualism: Transcending a traditional opposition. Culture & Psychology 18(3), pp. 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X12446232
29. Pew Research Center (May 10, 2017). Religious Belief and National Belonging in Central and Eastern Europe [Report]. Retrieved from http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2017/05/15120244/CEUP-FULL-REPORT.pdf.
30. Quinn, N. (2005). Finding culture in talk: A collection of methods. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
31. Quinn, N. (2011). The History of the Cultural Models School Reconsidered: A Paradigm Shift in Cognitive Anthropology. In D. B. Kronenfeld, M. Bennardo, V. De Munck, & M. Fischer, A companion to cognitive anthropology (pp. 30-46). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
32. Romney, A., Batchelder, W., & Weller, S. (1987). Recent applications of cultural consensus theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 31(2), pp. 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276487031002003
33. Ruiu, G. (2012). Is fatalism a cultural belief? An empirical analysis on the origin of fatalistic tendencies. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/41705/
34. Ruiu, G. (2013). The origin of fatalistic tendencies: An empirical investigation. Economics & Sociology, 6(2), pp. 103-125. DOI:10.14254/2071-789X.2013/6-2/10
35. Shapiro, J., & Wu, S. (2011). Fatalism and savings. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(5), pp. 645-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.05.003
36. Shore, B. (1996). Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture, and the. Problem of Meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Shweder, R., & Miller, J. (1991). The social construction of the person: How is it possible? In R. A. (Ed.), Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology (pp. 156–195). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Strauss, C., & Quinn, N. (1997). A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Straughan, P., & Seow, A. (1998). Fatalism reconceptualized: a concept to predict health screening behavior. Journal of Gender, Culture and Health, 3(2), pp. 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023278230797
40. Tripathi, R., & Leviatan, U. (2003). Individualism and collectivism: In search of a product or process? Culture & Psychology, 9(1), pp. 79–88. DOI: 10.1177/1354067X03009001005
41. Valsiner, J. (2014). Invitation to Cultural Psychology. Sage.
42. Valsiner, J. (2019). Culture & Psychology: 25 Constructive years. Culture & Psychology, 25(4), pp. 429-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X19872358
43. Weber, M. (1905). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.
44. Yamaguchi, S. (2001). Culture and control orientations. In D. Matsumoto , The handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 223-243).
45. Young, M., Chen, N., & Morris, M. (2009). Belief in stable and fleeting luck and achievement motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(2), pp. 150-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.009
46. Young, M., Morris, M., Burrus, J., Krishnan, L., & Regmi, M. (2011). Deity and destiny: Patterns of fatalistic thinking in Christian and Hindu cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(6), pp. 1030-1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110381123
47. აბაკელია, ნ. (1997). სიმბოლო და რიტუალი ქართულ კულტურაში [Symbol and Ritual in Georgian Culture]. ივ. ჯავახიშვილის სახელობის ისტორიისა და ეთნოგრაფიის ინსტიტუტი. თბილისი.
48. ბასიალაია, მ. (2008). ეთნოსები საქართველოში [Ethnic groups in Georgia]. საქართველოს სახალხო დამცველთან არსებული ტოლერანტობის ცენტრი. თბილისი.
49. ომიაძე, ს. (2006). ქართული დისკურსის ლინგვოკულტურულ შემადგენელთა სტრუქტურა, სემანტიკა და ფუნქციონირება [The structure, semantics and function of the lingvocultural characteristics of Georgian discourse] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). არნ. ჩიქობავას ენათმეცნიერების ინსტიტუტი. თბილისი.
50. ჩუბინიძე, დ. (2018). ქართული ანდაზები და ადაპტაციური ქცევის კულტურული მოდელები [Georgian proverbs and cultural models of adaptive behavior] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).ივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახელობის თბილისის სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტი. თბილისი


Download data is not yet available.